// NATURE NEWS — SPAZIO & SCIENZA
NSF moves to overhaul funding approach in line with White House priorities
Dan Garisto is a freelance reporter in Syracuse, New York.
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
The US National Science Foundation might cut back on its core research grants in favour of those driven by the priorities of US President Donald Trump. Credit: Tada Images/Shutterstock
The US National Science Foundation (NSF) is changing how it funds research grants — and how it decides which ones to fund — to better align with White House priorities, according to a letter released on 10 September.
“NSF is taking decisive action to meet this moment, introducing new and ambitious ideas that capitalize on the changes in the scientific ecosystem to advance our core mission,” says the letter. It is signed by Brian Stone, who is standing in as the NSF’s director.
NSF plans cuts to core science programmes to fund White House initiative
Since its inception in 1950, the NSF, a major funder of basic research, has solicited proposals on topics informed heavily by the scientific community. The letter describes a shift to a “portfolio-based” approach to making grants that combines traditional “investigator-driven inquiry” with “NSF-directed opportunities”. The letter does not say what the opportunities will be, but states that the NSF will specify objectives but “never the method scientists must use” to achieve them.
Staff members at the agency, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, are concerned that the changes will lead to further cuts for work that has long been core to the agency’s mission: discovery-focused research, led by the curiosity of scientists.
When asked for comment on criticisms of the changes, an NSF spokesperson directed Nature to Stone’s letter.
The announcement is the latest in a stream of changes at the NSF instigated by the administration of US President Donald Trump. The administration has prioritized research on artificial intelligence and argued for fundamental changes to who receives research funding and how, while attempting to cut federal science budgets and give political officials more say in grant decisions.